AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
All chess pieces name2/19/2024 Furthermore, knights have the advantage of being able to control squares of either color, unlike a lone bishop. Knights are superior to bishops in an endgame if all the pawns are on one side of the board. This limitation is less important, however, in endgames with pawns on only one side of the board. A knight can exert control over only one part of the board at a time and often takes multiple moves to reposition to a new location, which often makes it less suitable in endgames with pawns on both sides of the board. White wins if Black is to move.Ĭompared to a bishop, a knight is often not as good in an endgame. In an endgame without other pieces or pawns, two knights generally have a better chance of forming a drawing fortress against a queen than do two bishops or a bishop and a knight. However, Glenn Flear found no game of Capablanca's that supported his statement statistics do not support the statement, either. World Champion José Raúl Capablanca considered that a queen and a knight is usually a better combination than a queen and a bishop. As such, a pair of bishops is usually considered better than a pair of knights. Whereas two bishops cover each other's weaknesses, two knights tend not to cooperate with each other as efficiently. In the diagram, White's knight on d5 is very powerful – more powerful than Black's bishop on g7. a square which cannot be attacked by enemy pawns. For this reason, a knight is effective when placed in a weakness in the opponent's pawn structure, i.e. A knight occupying a hole (d5) in the enemy pawn structureĮnemy pawns are effective at harassing knights because a pawn attacking a knight is not itself attacked by the knight.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |